Run the Same Model Institutional Analysts Use on ISO 20022 Coins
If XRP, XLM, or HBAR captures a slice of global cross-border payments, what is the implied price? Move the market share slider. The formula does the rest.
Scenario modeling only. Not a price prediction. Not financial advice.
Scenario Preset
1% capture, the most cited base case in institutional analysis from BIS Quarterly and Messari macro research.
Parameters
Annual settled flow: $18.90T at 100% on-chain capture
How many times each token is reused per year. Higher velocity means lower required market cap.
Fraction of FX volume that actually settles on-chain vs. traditional rails
ISO 20022 Portfolio Builder
Once you have a price thesis, model your portfolio allocation across all 8 ISO 20022 coins.
Market Cap Equivalency Calculator
See what implied prices compare to gold, the S&P 500, and global M1 money supply.
ISO 20022 Coin Comparison Matrix
Side-by-side specs for all 8 ISO 20022 coins: TPS, finality, RMG status, and live prices.
Common Questions
What is the "% of SWIFT capture" formula and where does it come from?
The formula models what a coin's market cap would need to be if it settled a given share of global cross-border FX flow. The core equation is: Implied Market Cap = (Daily FX Volume × 252 trading days × Capture % × Market Share %) ÷ Velocity. The implied price is then that market cap divided by circulating supply. This approach — anchored to BIS Triennial Survey FX data — is the same framework used in major institutional analyses of XRP, XLM, and HBAR price potential. The "velocity" term accounts for how many times each token is reused per year in settlement (higher velocity = lower required market cap for the same transaction volume).
Why is velocity (v) used in the formula?
Velocity is the monetary economics concept for how many times a unit of currency changes hands in a given period. A token with velocity 10 settles 10 times its market cap worth of transactions per year. Higher velocity means you need less market cap to process the same volume — so the implied price is lower. XRP's on-demand liquidity model implies relatively high velocity (7–10x) because the same XRP can be recycled across multiple payments in the same day. A CBDC-backed stablecoin pegged 1:1 might have velocity 1. The velocity assumption is the biggest variable in the model — which is why this calculator lets you adjust it.
What does "1% of SWIFT" actually mean in dollar terms?
The BIS Triennial Central Bank Survey (2022) measured daily global FX market turnover at approximately $7.5 trillion. At 252 trading days per year, that is roughly $1.89 quadrillion in annual FX volume. One percent of that is ~$18.9 trillion per year in settled payments. At a velocity of 7.5, that implies a ~$2.5 trillion market cap for whichever coin settles it — roughly double Bitcoin's market cap as of early 2026. The "Realistic (1%)" preset is the scenario most frequently cited in institutional-grade editorial analysis of XRP's potential.
Why only XRP, XLM, and HBAR — what about XDC, QNT, ALGO?
This calculator specifically models cross-border payment settlement scenarios. XRP (RippleNet bridge currency), XLM (Stellar remittance anchors), and HBAR (Hedera tokenization and CBDC pilots) each have explicit cross-border payment use cases supported by live institutional deployments. XDC is primarily trade finance (invoice tokenization, not FX settlement). QNT is an interoperability layer, not a settlement coin. ALGO is general-purpose. ADA has no active cross-border payment narrative supported by institutional evidence. Adding coins without real payment use cases would produce misleading numbers.